Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Health Insurance and Auto Insurance

It is beyond sad when our highest ranking elected and appointed officials openly display their ignorance as to how markets work.  The unconstitutional and disastrous "health care" bill is being analogized with auto insurance, however this is either due to complete ignorance (regarding topics such as insurance and
risk) or outright coercion with the intent to control and ultimately plunder and redistribute in order to maintain and gain further control.

Ed Morrissey of hotair.com writes about the administrations recent attempt to deceive us in his recent post "Holder and Sebelius trot out the auto-insurance canard":


This is such a bad argument that it staggers the imagination why the administration would still be making it.  Drivers carry required insurance to cover damage done to others, not themselves, for one thing.  It’s not applicable at all.  Furthermore, states impose the insurance requirement, not the federal government, because states license drivers and vehicles.  Driving is, after all, a voluntary activity conducted on public property (roads); there is no requirement for licensing or insurance for those who drive only on their private property.  People who don’t drive on public roads aren’t required to buy a license or the insurance.


There are other problems with this analogy as well.  Those who do have auto insurance only file claims when significant damage occurs.  Auto insurance doesn’t pay for routine maintenance, like oil changes, lube jobs, and tire rotation.  That’s why auto insurance is relatively affordable.

Also, auto insurance is priced to risk.  If a driver lives in a high-crime area, then the premiums will rise to cover the risks associated with theft.  If they drive badly (get moving violations and accidents), premiums will go up, or in some cases, the insurer will drop the driver.  Policies are priced for risk according to age as well; the youngest and oldest drivers pay more due to their propensity for causing losses.   Those who drive well and present a lower risk get rewarded with lower premiums.  Right now, the federal government is preventing insurers in some instances from risk-pricing health insurance to impose government-approved fairness.  That means we all pay more, removing the incentive to lower risk.

Finally, let’s use another related analogy: fire insurance.  If we forced insurers to write comprehensive policies on burning homes, we would have no insurers left in the market.  However, Holder and Sebelius want health insurers to do the same thing — and need the mandate to force all of us to assume that risk through the higher premiums that subsidize it.  And, by the way, the government is doing exactly what Holder derogates in the essay — forcing insurers to write policies after the accident/fire/illness.  

The need to reform the health-care economic model is real.  Holder, Sebelius, and Barack Obama have gone in the wrong direction through the imposition of government mandates and the calcification of the third-party payer model.  We need to break that model for routine health maintenance and return insurance to the role of indemnifying against substantial loss and end the tax incentives for the market distortion of the employer-based health care model.  

A free market system is the only path to both higher quality of care and lower prices.  The fact that the people charged with representing us do not understand this is embarrassing.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I agree. In other countries, health care is totally up to the individual. Getting major medical insurance plans is a personal decision. Government-provided means bad quality, free market means better quality: that's the trade-off we face.

Valerie Phillips said...

s

private health insurance australia said...

All this talk about mandatory health care is also not sitting too well with me. First and foremost, not everyone can afford any form of insurance.

sophialevis said...

This is a cool and nice post ever.I was looking at some of your posts on this website and I conceive this web site is really instructive.Top Seattle Insurance

Post a Comment